Comparing Rating Systems For NCAA Tournament

The images represent how each rating system projects the NCAAB Tournament. The higher rated team was selected for each matchup. For the bracket labeled “PINNY”, the future odds from Pinnacle were used to assess team-by-team comparison. Click on the image for full-size view.

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

NCAAB Conference Tourney’s: Pinny v KenPom

KenPom LOG5′s here

Top 5 Value:
Kansas
Indiana
Syracuse
Ohio State
SEC Field

ACC Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
UNC 53.52% 52.20% -0.0132
Duke 21.30% 19.80% -0.0150
FSU 10.39% 9.90% -0.0049
UVA 6.65% 10.40% 0.0375
NC State 3.44% 2.40% -0.0104
Miami 2.48% 3.70% 0.0122
Field 2.22% 1.60% -0.0062
PAC 12 Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
California 30.29% 32.30% 0.0201
Oregon 15.94% 12.20% -0.0374
UCLA 14.82% 14.90% 0.0008
Washington 14.76% 12.20% -0.0256
Arizona 9.47% 12.70% 0.0323
Stanford 5.98% 8.00% 0.0202
Colorado 3.93% 3.90% -0.0003
Oregon St. 2.87% 2.80% -0.0007
Field 1.94% 1.00% -0.0094
SEC Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
Kentucky 72.63% 68.70% -0.0393
Field 27.37% 31.30% 0.0393
Big East Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
Syracuse 33.02% 39.50% 0.0648
Marquette 18.42% 20.10% 0.0168
Georgetown 13.81% 15.10% 0.0129
Notre Dame 7.21% 7.90% 0.0069
Cincy 6.94% 5.60% -0.0134
Loserville 6.94% 5.50% -0.0144
USF 3.53% 1.50% -0.0203
WVU 3.52% 1.90% -0.0162
Uconn 2.78% 1.40% -0.0138
Seton Hall 1.27% 0.70% -0.0057
Pitt 1.08% 0.20% -0.0088
St. John’s 0.37% 0.08% -0.0029
Field 1.10% 0.52% -0.0058
Big Ten Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
Ohio State 32.29% 37.20% 0.0491
Michigan St. 23.34% 27.20% 0.0386
Michigan 15.96% 5.10% -0.1086
Wisconsin 10.48% 10.40% -0.0008
Indiana 9.74% 16.50% 0.0676
Purdue 3.73% 2.50% -0.0123
Nwestern 2.17% 0.50% -0.0167
Illinois 0.79% 0.20% -0.0059
Field 1.51% 0.40% -0.0111
Big 12 Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
Kansas 39.33% 54.60% 0.1527
Missouri 32.93% 23.00% -0.0993
Baylor 9.43% 7.30% -0.0213
Kansas St. 6.52% 5.00% -0.0152
Iowa St 5.97% 4.50% -0.0147
Texas 4.96% 5.00% 0.0004
Oklahoma St 0.57% 0.40% -0.0017
Field 0.29% 0.20% -0.0009
Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

NCAAB Shady Line Alert

#15 Connecticut PK -110

Michigan +1 -110

$55 / $50

I feel like I should apologize, offer some sort of conciliatory remark for taking advantage of this situation.  The Math Geeks have Michigan winning this game despite what perception would have us believe.  Let them do all the homework, while the public throws away money with serene blindness in pursuit of pleasure.

The Big East has another game that found my interest, and it tips off early.

Georgetown +5 -110

Villanova -5 -110

$55 / $50

Early move down on the line, and being a market reader, not one to breakdown games, I’m inclined to look only a little further. To find something else that I can lean on.  And once again the Math Geeks offer cushion lest I fell on the callous nature of a guess.

Proceed with caution, I suck at picking Big East games.

Share

, , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

NCAAB Trio of Guesses with Reasoning

Please allow due diligence for lofty composition, or just scan post for words in bold for the winners.

Boston College @ Duke

High lines and low lines, always try to find highs and lows.  Duke is 11-5-1 ATS since the 2004 season as a conference favorite of 15 or more.  That’s where I chose to end my research.  Any further research would put a severe hindrance on my opportunity cost, thereby lowering the absolute value of wager placed in proportion to time invested.  Why did I choose not to look past the year 2004?  Thomas Friedman said it best, around this time, the world transformed into a “flat world.”  Immediacy of information not only supercharged the infrastructure of communication, supply chain, and management systems, but had the intolerable effect of the bookies creating ‘sharper’ lines.  The wireless world we live in brings expediency of information.  The paradigm of the bookie operation invariably coincides with significant changes in society.  Every pecuniary endeavor, whether of avocation or vocation, sees greater benefits when utilizing the principles of calculated efficiency.

See the plays after the jump

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments

NCAAB Monday Shady Line Alert

#6 Villanova @ Louisville

Line is conspicuously disproportional to the ranking.  The math geeks like Louisville, the bookies like Louisville, but the rankings and public do not.

A brief survey of Kenpom shows there might be a false ranking on Villanova.  Their schedule is splattered with home games vs serviceable teams amidst little sisters of the poor.  They are 1-1 on the road.

#6 Villanova +3 -110

Louisville -3 -110

$110 / $100

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment