Posts Tagged Big 10

NCAAB Championship Sunday Thoughts

Houston coming through with the unexpected CUSA title after beating UTEP was a gorgeous state of affairs, combating my latest tendency for profit dwindling wagers.  One big future play turned a terrible month into a serviceable one.   That play owes much to my efforts in breaking down the CUSA tournament.  

A quick survey of the games on schedule tomorrow, and Minnesota +4 immediately stands out, as my chalk stipulation had them at a better chance to win the BIG TEN tournament compared to offshore numbers. It appears to be a favorable situation for the Golden Gophers, the Buckeyes needed a heroic buzzer beater by All-American Evan Turner to sneak by Michigan, and then escaped with a hard fought, emotional 2OT victory versus Illinois.   All the while Minnesota was out-willing Michigan State and demoralizing the sans Hummel Purdue Boilermakers.   Minnesota should be a solid bet for tomorrow, but I think it peradventure to say I will make the wager based on regret, regret that I didn’t adhere to my own comprehensive analysis of Minnesota heading into the tournament, and missed out on the 20/1 odds appropriated by a variety of books.   Could be seen as a forced wager, though seemingly a solid investment nonetheless.

Here are adjusted efficiency lines, and the lines based on conference spreads for each game:

Efficiency Average Spread
Georgia Tech 10.5 Georgia Tech 10.5
Duke -10.5 Duke -10.5
Richmond 1 Richmond 2.5
Temple -1 Temple -2.5
Mississippi St 8.5 Mississippi St 6
Kentucky -8.5 Kentucky -6
Minnesota 5 Minnesota 3
Ohio State -5 Ohio State -3

Richmond has an advantage here, based on regular season performance and convened line. These numbers do not include tournament play. I give up on the A10 though, Dayton and Rhode Island have been the proverbial thorn in my degenerated side, inducing much head banging against wall to quell the pain of being imminently screwed. Just Minnesota for me.

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Big Ten Tournament Breakdown

CBS Bracket here.

Bracket Project has four Big 10 teams in, with the lowest seed in conference at a 5 (Michigan State).  Illinois has a slim chance, heading outwards on that now proverbial S-curve, a solid showing in the Big 10 tournament may secure their position.  Here is how the chalk stipulation plays out.

First, using the average  spread appropriate throughout the conference season:

BIG10 TOURNAMENT AVERAGE SPREAD
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Final
Team / Spread ML
Team / Spread ML
Team / Spread ML
Team / Spread ML
Michigan -10 -531









Iowa 10 434
Michigan 6.5 239









Ohio State -6.5 -293












Ohio State -2 -143






Wisconsin -5.5 -242
Wisconsin 2 117






Illinois 5.5 198






Northwestern -7.5 -345






Ohio State 2 123
Indiana 7.5 282
Northwestern 11 485



Purdue -2 -150



Purdue -11 -592






Minnesota -9 -435



Purdue -2 -145



Penn State 9 356
Minnesota 3 140
Michigan State 2 119






Michigan St -3 -171


















The odds and some comparisons if such were played out:

Big10 Average Spread Odds
Team True Odds SBET GREEK BODOG
Purdue 235 450 350 450
Ohio State 428 150 250 175
Michigan State 583 175 200 215
Wisconsin 747 200 200 200
Minnesota 1765 1500 2000 2000
Illinois 4488 1300 1500 2000
Michigan 4600 6500 2000 3000
Northwestern 15773 5000 1500 4000
Penn State 169364 7000 2500 3000
Iowa 321421 110000 2500 3000
Indiana 1023844 100000 2500 3000

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Integration of Pythagorean / NDist Formula to Predict Games

The previous post demonstrated how to calculated the Pythagorean Formula, as well as the more regressional Normal Distribution calculation for predicting ATS records. The two games that were of focus were Dayton and Baylor. Dayton has an expected ATS record above what is actual, while Temple was over-performing its Pythagorean expectation. Regardless, Temple won and covered. But the discrepancies were very slight, not really conducive to a firm grasp on how the game plays out, since there are yet enough games on schedule for both teams’ expected ATS record to round into form.

Baylor, however, appeared to have a major advantage in both expectation being higher than their actual record, and the opposite being true for their opponent. Though Baylor, also failed to cover the 6.5 points, despite winning SU.

There were five games that met a criteria as being highly anomalous in calculating expectation versus actual. The formulas were discussed in the previous post, so I will just list the games (The numbers used for conference games to formulate a normal distribution expected W% have not been updated through February 23rd, but a prediction can still be made from that point forward to gauge the rest of the season. Pythagorean formulas are independent of overall conference play):
Read the rest of this entry »

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

9 Comments

Fading Illinois; Wisconsin -9

Illinois students rushed the court following their upset of then #5 Michigan State.  The emotional high that is induced by the relative faithful celebrating by way of on-court orgy strikes at the core of the inexorable nature of gravity.  Once the next game starts, the ephemeral pedestal gets swiped away at the legs, and the team comes crashing down.  I’ve been following this rather closely.  The last five times a team endured this scenario, they failed to cover the next game.  A very savory and welcoming trend, and I feel inclined to take advantage. Doesn’t hurt that the Illini have to navigate their way through the ineffable confines of the Kohl Center, where Wisconsin is 60-5 since the 2007 season.   The Math Geeks are high on the Badgers as well.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

NCAAB Shady Line Alert, Desperation, and Fade

#5 Michigan State -1.5 -110

Illinois +1.5 -110

Ranking disparity is severely out of proportion with the Vegas number. However, the Math Geeks would think it appropriate.  For some reason, Kenpom has not become a widespread tool for the public to use.  I dread the day when ESPN becomes affiliated with Kenpom.  As information becomes more known, it makes it harder for bettors who are aware to take advantage.  Until then, I will have to rely on the barometers that are available to gauge a false public opinion.

This game is probably do or die as well for the Illinois and their tourney hopes.

Illinois +1.5 -110

$55 / $50

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment