Posts Tagged championship
Comparing Rating Systems For NCAA Tournament
Posted by Rufio Magillicutty in Betting, kenpom, NCAAB, Pinnacle, tournament on March 15, 2012
The images represent how each rating system projects the NCAAB Tournament. The higher rated team was selected for each matchup. For the bracket labeled “PINNY”, the future odds from Pinnacle were used to assess team-by-team comparison. Click on the image for full-size view.
- KENPOM
- BBSTATE
- PINNY
- SAGARIN
- RPI
NCAAB Conference Tourney’s: Pinny v KenPom
Posted by Rufio Magillicutty in kenpom, NCAAB, Pinnacle on March 6, 2012
KenPom LOG5′s here
Top 5 Value:
Kansas
Indiana
Syracuse
Ohio State
SEC Field
| ACC Tourney | |||
| Team | Pinny | KP | KP-P |
| UNC | 53.52% | 52.20% | -0.0132 |
| Duke | 21.30% | 19.80% | -0.0150 |
| FSU | 10.39% | 9.90% | -0.0049 |
| UVA | 6.65% | 10.40% | 0.0375 |
| NC State | 3.44% | 2.40% | -0.0104 |
| Miami | 2.48% | 3.70% | 0.0122 |
| Field | 2.22% | 1.60% | -0.0062 |
| PAC 12 Tourney | |||
| Team | Pinny | KP | KP-P |
| California | 30.29% | 32.30% | 0.0201 |
| Oregon | 15.94% | 12.20% | -0.0374 |
| UCLA | 14.82% | 14.90% | 0.0008 |
| Washington | 14.76% | 12.20% | -0.0256 |
| Arizona | 9.47% | 12.70% | 0.0323 |
| Stanford | 5.98% | 8.00% | 0.0202 |
| Colorado | 3.93% | 3.90% | -0.0003 |
| Oregon St. | 2.87% | 2.80% | -0.0007 |
| Field | 1.94% | 1.00% | -0.0094 |
| SEC Tourney | |||
| Team | Pinny | KP | KP-P |
| Kentucky | 72.63% | 68.70% | -0.0393 |
| Field | 27.37% | 31.30% | 0.0393 |
| Big East Tourney | |||
| Team | Pinny | KP | KP-P |
| Syracuse | 33.02% | 39.50% | 0.0648 |
| Marquette | 18.42% | 20.10% | 0.0168 |
| Georgetown | 13.81% | 15.10% | 0.0129 |
| Notre Dame | 7.21% | 7.90% | 0.0069 |
| Cincy | 6.94% | 5.60% | -0.0134 |
| Loserville | 6.94% | 5.50% | -0.0144 |
| USF | 3.53% | 1.50% | -0.0203 |
| WVU | 3.52% | 1.90% | -0.0162 |
| Uconn | 2.78% | 1.40% | -0.0138 |
| Seton Hall | 1.27% | 0.70% | -0.0057 |
| Pitt | 1.08% | 0.20% | -0.0088 |
| St. John’s | 0.37% | 0.08% | -0.0029 |
| Field | 1.10% | 0.52% | -0.0058 |
| Big Ten Tourney | |||
| Team | Pinny | KP | KP-P |
| Ohio State | 32.29% | 37.20% | 0.0491 |
| Michigan St. | 23.34% | 27.20% | 0.0386 |
| Michigan | 15.96% | 5.10% | -0.1086 |
| Wisconsin | 10.48% | 10.40% | -0.0008 |
| Indiana | 9.74% | 16.50% | 0.0676 |
| Purdue | 3.73% | 2.50% | -0.0123 |
| Nwestern | 2.17% | 0.50% | -0.0167 |
| Illinois | 0.79% | 0.20% | -0.0059 |
| Field | 1.51% | 0.40% | -0.0111 |
| Big 12 Tourney | |||
| Team | Pinny | KP | KP-P |
| Kansas | 39.33% | 54.60% | 0.1527 |
| Missouri | 32.93% | 23.00% | -0.0993 |
| Baylor | 9.43% | 7.30% | -0.0213 |
| Kansas St. | 6.52% | 5.00% | -0.0152 |
| Iowa St | 5.97% | 4.50% | -0.0147 |
| Texas | 4.96% | 5.00% | 0.0004 |
| Oklahoma St | 0.57% | 0.40% | -0.0017 |
| Field | 0.29% | 0.20% | -0.0009 |
Buying Low on Tiger Woods
Posted by Rufio Magillicutty in Tiger Woods on August 13, 2010
Over-reacting can be a parasite. And the bookies throwing out 15/1 odds on Tiger is a parasitic symptom of which I’m more than happy to exploit.
Any doubts of not getting value on Tiger were swiftly quelled by the efforts of The Saw.
Gambling is a cumulative process, and one has to merely survive the vacillations of success/failure while at the same time gradually building bankroll, before being afforded the luxury of taking the proverbial “shot in the dark.”
Lakers vs Boston Finals Breakdown
Posted by Rufio Magillicutty in Betting, Featurific, NBA on May 31, 2010
I’ve decided to purely use the line as a speculative tool for a series outcome. I arrived at the conclusion based on how the playoffs have played out thus far. Lakers and Boston both finished in the top 5 in both average home and road line, while Boston finished out of the top 5 at home using efficiency statistics. Though I should say their regular season and playoff performances on the road have been very impressive, accumulating a rating 2nd overall.
The Lakers meanwhile, even including the playoffs, finished barely in the top half of the western conference based on a road efficiency rating, yet were ranked 1st in average line. On average the teams with the highest overall line advanced further in the playoffs (Lakers 1st, Boston 3rd in their respective conferences).
Here are the line odds, Pythagorean and an expectation based on a linear forecast (numbers are aggregated exclusively from playoff lines):
We would expect the linear formulation to be conducive to regression, which is reasonable considering its a regression model. But the numbers clearly show the Lakers as being the conspicuous favorite, an obvious product that could be betrayed by way of sitting in chair in thought. Yet the goal is to find value, so to find value these numbers have to be compared to the market, and pinnacle sets the market. Here are Pinnacle odds to win:
To compare to Pinnacle, Sportsbetting currently is -170/+150, the best price I’ve found so far. So at its core, this is an optimal situation for which the +EV condition comes into affect. Outcomes for the most part in the NBA are unpredictable when two teams have sufficient depth of talent. We have seen with the Lakers, that homecourt advantage is a huge factor in determining the imminent series winner. And one could always summon the revenge factor stemming from the Celtics beating the Lakers in 2008 finals.
Bottom line though, the Lakers have had the higher lines, with some consequence, in comparison to Boston, despite playing in the what is considered to be tougher conference. Using just the playoff lines, the relative venue game lines are:
@ Lakers ~ -12
@ Boston ~ -4.5
Certainly its hard for me to believe the oddsmakers would set a double digit favorite for the Lakers at the Staples Center, regardless what the raw statistics suggest. The number will probably be within a range of @ Lakers -8 and @ Boston -4. In fact the Lakers game 1 is -6, again more value on the Lakers.
Personally from my view, since I’ve had some success in these playoffs to this point, and have been serviceable in the futures market (1-3 +1.5* or 14% ROI), I may consider laying the -180 on the Lakers, hopefully finding a better price, and let the series play out.
I’ll revisit later in the week once exacta odds are released.
Orlando Magic adjusted Deficit Odds
Posted by Rufio Magillicutty in Betting, Featurific, NBA on May 27, 2010
With their latest win, the Magic are one step closer to an historic comeback, versus the Celtics from the recently much maligned city of Boston (see Bruins).
So what were their chances of winning four straight earlier in the series? Well the marked difference between team performance and average line, and how each compared to the series odds was addressed in the Eastern Conference Finals analysis here. But the disparity of the odds is never more evident than it is when calculating the chances of overcoming the 3-0 deficit. Here were the odds for the Magic down 3-0.
| Magic Odds of winning down 3-0 | ||||
| Metric | Pyth L/W% | Linear L/W% | Pyth Eff/W% | Linear Eff/W% |
| Odds | 1313 | 1341 | 569 | 607 |
And here are the current odds of overcoming a 3-2 deficit:
| Magic Odds of winning down 3-2 | ||||
| Metric | Pyth L/W% | Linear L/W% | Pyth Eff/W% | Linear Eff/W% |
| Odds | 265 | 269 | 154 | 160 |
The conspicuous difference in average line metrics (Pyth L, Linear L) and those based on performance (Pyth Eff, Linear Eff) suggests perhaps the oddsmakers weren’t sold on the Magic as a championship contender. Yet the reverse is true for Boston, which explains the drastic fluctuation in the magnitude when measuring the two team components. The season statistics are diametric opposites.
| Boston | Orlando | |
| Eff Margin | -3.67 | -7.46 |
| Avg Line | -5.12 | -6.49 |
Boston underperformed the market, roughly by a margin of 1.5 pts. And Orlando overperformed their market, by around 1 pt.









Recent Comments