Posts Tagged championship

Comparing Rating Systems For NCAA Tournament

The images represent how each rating system projects the NCAAB Tournament. The higher rated team was selected for each matchup. For the bracket labeled “PINNY”, the future odds from Pinnacle were used to assess team-by-team comparison. Click on the image for full-size view.

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

NCAAB Conference Tourney’s: Pinny v KenPom

KenPom LOG5′s here

Top 5 Value:
Kansas
Indiana
Syracuse
Ohio State
SEC Field

ACC Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
UNC 53.52% 52.20% -0.0132
Duke 21.30% 19.80% -0.0150
FSU 10.39% 9.90% -0.0049
UVA 6.65% 10.40% 0.0375
NC State 3.44% 2.40% -0.0104
Miami 2.48% 3.70% 0.0122
Field 2.22% 1.60% -0.0062
PAC 12 Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
California 30.29% 32.30% 0.0201
Oregon 15.94% 12.20% -0.0374
UCLA 14.82% 14.90% 0.0008
Washington 14.76% 12.20% -0.0256
Arizona 9.47% 12.70% 0.0323
Stanford 5.98% 8.00% 0.0202
Colorado 3.93% 3.90% -0.0003
Oregon St. 2.87% 2.80% -0.0007
Field 1.94% 1.00% -0.0094
SEC Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
Kentucky 72.63% 68.70% -0.0393
Field 27.37% 31.30% 0.0393
Big East Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
Syracuse 33.02% 39.50% 0.0648
Marquette 18.42% 20.10% 0.0168
Georgetown 13.81% 15.10% 0.0129
Notre Dame 7.21% 7.90% 0.0069
Cincy 6.94% 5.60% -0.0134
Loserville 6.94% 5.50% -0.0144
USF 3.53% 1.50% -0.0203
WVU 3.52% 1.90% -0.0162
Uconn 2.78% 1.40% -0.0138
Seton Hall 1.27% 0.70% -0.0057
Pitt 1.08% 0.20% -0.0088
St. John’s 0.37% 0.08% -0.0029
Field 1.10% 0.52% -0.0058
Big Ten Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
Ohio State 32.29% 37.20% 0.0491
Michigan St. 23.34% 27.20% 0.0386
Michigan 15.96% 5.10% -0.1086
Wisconsin 10.48% 10.40% -0.0008
Indiana 9.74% 16.50% 0.0676
Purdue 3.73% 2.50% -0.0123
Nwestern 2.17% 0.50% -0.0167
Illinois 0.79% 0.20% -0.0059
Field 1.51% 0.40% -0.0111
Big 12 Tourney
Team Pinny KP KP-P
Kansas 39.33% 54.60% 0.1527
Missouri 32.93% 23.00% -0.0993
Baylor 9.43% 7.30% -0.0213
Kansas St. 6.52% 5.00% -0.0152
Iowa St 5.97% 4.50% -0.0147
Texas 4.96% 5.00% 0.0004
Oklahoma St 0.57% 0.40% -0.0017
Field 0.29% 0.20% -0.0009
Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Buying Low on Tiger Woods

Over-reacting can be a parasite.  And the bookies throwing out 15/1 odds on Tiger is a parasitic symptom of which I’m more than happy to exploit.

http://twitter.com/SpOrtsoBjective/status/20943790693

Any doubts of not getting value on Tiger were swiftly quelled by the efforts of The Saw.

Gambling is a cumulative process, and one has to merely survive the vacillations of success/failure while at the same time gradually building bankroll, before being afforded the luxury of taking the proverbial “shot in the dark.”

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Lakers vs Boston Finals Breakdown

I’ve decided to purely use the line as a speculative tool for a series outcome.  I arrived at the conclusion based on how the playoffs have played out thus far.  Lakers and Boston both finished in the top 5 in both average home and road line, while Boston finished out of the top 5 at home using efficiency statistics.  Though I  should say their regular season and playoff performances on the road have been very impressive, accumulating a rating 2nd overall.

The Lakers meanwhile, even including the playoffs, finished barely in the top half of the western conference based on a road efficiency rating, yet were ranked 1st in average line.  On average the teams with the highest overall line advanced further in the playoffs (Lakers 1st, Boston 3rd in their respective conferences).

Here are the line odds, Pythagorean and an expectation based on a linear forecast (numbers are aggregated exclusively from playoff lines):

We would expect the linear formulation to be conducive to regression, which is reasonable considering its a regression model.  But the numbers clearly show the Lakers as being the conspicuous favorite, an obvious product that could be betrayed by way of sitting in chair in thought.  Yet the goal is to find value, so to find value these numbers have to be compared to the market, and pinnacle sets the market.  Here are Pinnacle odds to win:

To compare to Pinnacle, Sportsbetting currently is -170/+150, the best price I’ve found so far.  So at its core, this is an optimal situation for which the +EV condition comes into affect.  Outcomes for the most part in the NBA are unpredictable when two teams have sufficient depth of talent.  We have seen with the Lakers, that homecourt advantage is a huge factor in determining the imminent series winner.  And one could always summon the revenge factor stemming from the Celtics beating the Lakers in 2008 finals.

Bottom line though, the Lakers have had the higher lines, with some consequence, in comparison to Boston, despite playing in the what is considered to be tougher conference.  Using just the playoff lines, the relative venue game lines are:

@ Lakers ~ -12

@ Boston ~ -4.5

Certainly its hard for me to believe the oddsmakers would set a double digit favorite for the Lakers at the Staples Center, regardless what the raw statistics suggest.  The number will probably be within a range of @ Lakers -8 and @ Boston -4.  In fact the Lakers game 1 is -6, again more value on the Lakers.

Personally from my view, since I’ve had some success in these playoffs to this point, and have been serviceable in the futures market (1-3 +1.5* or 14% ROI),  I may consider laying the -180 on the Lakers, hopefully finding a better price, and let the series play out.

I’ll revisit later in the week once exacta odds are released.

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Orlando Magic adjusted Deficit Odds

With their latest win, the Magic are one step closer to an historic comeback, versus the Celtics from the recently much maligned city of Boston (see Bruins).

So what were their chances of winning four straight earlier in the series?  Well the marked difference between team performance and average line, and how each compared to the series odds was addressed in the Eastern Conference Finals analysis here.  But the disparity of the odds is never more evident than it is when calculating the chances of overcoming the 3-0 deficit.  Here were the odds for the Magic down 3-0.

Magic Odds of winning down 3-0
Metric Pyth L/W% Linear L/W% Pyth Eff/W% Linear Eff/W%
Odds 1313 1341 569 607

And here are the current odds of overcoming a 3-2 deficit:

Magic Odds of winning down 3-2
Metric Pyth L/W% Linear L/W% Pyth Eff/W% Linear Eff/W%
Odds 265 269 154 160

The conspicuous difference in average line metrics (Pyth L, Linear L) and those based on performance (Pyth Eff, Linear Eff) suggests perhaps the oddsmakers weren’t sold on the Magic as a championship contender. Yet the reverse is true for Boston, which explains the drastic fluctuation in the magnitude when measuring the two team components. The season statistics are diametric opposites.

Boston Orlando
Eff Margin -3.67 -7.46
Avg Line -5.12 -6.49

Boston underperformed the market, roughly by a margin of 1.5 pts.  And Orlando overperformed their market, by around 1 pt.

Share

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments